Corante



About this author

CORANTE

Arnold Kling has a Ph.D. in economics from MIT; founded homefair.com, one of the very first commercial websites, in 1994; separated from Homefair in January 2000 after it was sold to Homestore; is author of Under the Radar: Starting Your Internet Business without Venture Capital, and is an essayist. Send comments to us at econ@corante.com

Subscribe
Recent Comments

Recent Trackbacks

CATEGORIZED POSTS
Bottom Line Archives
Site Search



Powered by
Movable Type 3.2
Just Released the 2008 Tribalization of Business study - an in-depth look at how 140+ organizations are managing and measuring online communities
The Bottom Line

« Toldja So | Main | The Meaning of the Dean Candidacy »

December 22, 2003

State Telecom Regulation

Email This Entry

Posted by Arnold

Is a no-hoper, according to Raymond L. Gifford.


More troubling, the FCC’s implementation of the ’96 Act has conferred regulatory duties on the states that cannot be performed well, perhaps not by any entity, but certainly not by the states...

The FCC has directed the state commissions to price unbundled network elements using Total Element Long-Run Incremental Cost (TELRIC). TELRIC pricing is the epitome of what state commissions cannot do. Adopted by the FCC as part of its First Report and Order, which established the pricing methodology for unbundled network elements, TELRIC is a forward-looking pricing methodology that sets rates premised on the costs of an efficient, up-to-date incumbent, using commercially available technology...

Because the methodology is theoretical and forward-looking, there is more latitude respectively to inflate or minimize costs depending on a party’s interests. An incumbent local exchange carrier, seeking maximum cost recovery, will project forwardlooking efficient costs similar to its current, known costs because it wants to recover what it believes are its actual costs, even if they are in the future. Alternatively, a competitive local exchange carrier without its own facilities, will seek to minimize the costs on a future efficient network so that its cost of business is lower.


If your hero on the FCC is Michael Copps and you think that the 1996 telecom bill is sacred, then I suggest you read the whole article.

Thanks to Lynne Kiesling for the pointer.

Comments (1) + TrackBacks (0) | Category: telecom, FCC


COMMENTS

1. frank on February 18, 2004 01:00 PM writes...

What browser is required for:

http://www.corante.com/bottomline/archives/000935.html


?????????????

Permalink to Comment


EMAIL THIS ENTRY TO A FRIEND

Email this entry to:

Your email address:

Message (optional):




RELATED ENTRIES
test entry
Taking a Break
Moore's Law and Military Technology
Biotech and Sports
I'll take Ohio
Email Innovation?
99-cent rip-off
If Brad DeLong called me stupid